Have you ever found
yourself not so impressed with someone after a brief introduction? Like,
say, the proverbial mousy, slightly overweight girlfriend that a lot of
hot chicks keep around as sidekicks.
A
chance meeting a couple years after the first encounter reveals the
sidekick girl dresses sexier now, has slimmed down some and is more fun
than you initially gave her credit for. And you’re grateful she’s given
you another chance.
That’s the context in which I’ve put the Aprilia Shiver 750.
When
first I rode the SL750 two years ago I liked it enough, I guess. I
couldn’t deny the Shiver’s friendly rider ergos or its array of
technology, like three-mode rider-selectable engine mapping and
throttle-by-wire. Yet, however practical the Shiver was, it simply
didn’t turn me on.
I recently spent some time with
the updated 2011 Shiver (same as the European 2010 model sans ABS) and
came away from the experience with genuine admiration for the updated
bike.
Go to hair and make-up, please!
Though the latest SL750 hasn’t
received sweeping changes from the 2008/09 versions, the few changes it
has are largely a result of Shiver customer input, according to Aprilia.
A
narrower saddle, a new flyscreen, lower handlebars and rear-set foot
controls are meant to impart a sportier feeling bike, while wave brake
rotors, a narrower (5.5” vs. 6.0”) rear wheel and updated fuel mapping
round out the technical upgrades.
I’d
like to tell you the adjustments to the ergos serve as a vast
improvement from what the first iteration of the Shiver offered, but the
truth is I didn’t find the old dimensions a problem and so can’t say
definitively the changes are of huge benefit.
What is a nice addition is the new color-matched flyscreen.
Though
it doesn’t wrap the rider in a cocoon of still air, it nevertheless
helps reduce some windblast compared to the old bike. In fairness, the
fully naked Shiver of yore (okay, just one model year ago) did at least a
decent job of deflecting wind via the headlight’s shape.
Maybe
I simply didn’t spend enough time with Shiver 1.0, but after I pulled
my first wheelie on the ’11 model I had to wonder what I missed the
first time. How could I forget such a fun, grunty, ferocious 750cc
V-Twin?
No
changes are listed for the liquid-cooled, four-valves-per cylinder,
DOHC, 749cc, 90-degree Twin, yet it made a different impression on me
this time out.
And by different I mean it’s a
barrel o’ monkeys to whack the throttle open, fan the clutch and try to
contain the front-end. Also unchanged is the funky undertail exhaust,
but here again I thought I should’ve remembered such a burly noisemaker
providing a neat pop and burble on the overrun after you slam the
throttle shut from higher rpm.
Despite
my faulty memory, I still knew the Shiver came with three-mode mapping,
and that although Sport mode gives the rider the full boil, it’s also
pretty abrupt upon reapplication of the throttle. It’s interesting this
little glitch remains in light of mapping updates that have otherwise
smoothed throttle response and fueling from the previous model.
The
solution to the somewhat snatchy fueling in Sport is to switch over to
Touring mode, which still gives full peak power, but doles it out in
smoother batches. And Rain mode is still there, of course, muting power
considerably just as it did before.
The
one thing I’d like to see eliminated from the mode switching procedure
is the need for a fully closed throttle before mode changes take place.
While
bombing down the interstate (or just about anywhere, really) I don’t
care to decelerate to wait for the mode to switch, and then have to
crank the throttle to catch up to where I once was. After all, it’s not
like there’s such a great chasm of power between modes that the Shiver
might suddenly rear up, whinny, and dump her unsuspecting rider. This
isn’t a deal breaker by any means, just sayin’…
During
dyno time the 2011 Shiver churned out 73 hp at 8800 rpm, putting it in
the territory of Ducati’s newest air-cooled, two-valve Monster 796
that managed 76 hp at 8400 rpm when we recently tested it. However, the
Shiver’s peak torque production of 44.3 ft-lbs at 7600 rpm is bested by
the 796’s gruntier 53 ft-lbs at 6400 rpm.
New wave style rotors bring a
more contemporary, if not trendy look to the Shiver, but they may have
somehow improved braking performance. I recall the previous
Aprilia-branded radial-mount calipers and stainless steel braided lines
stopped the bike with force, maybe even with too much initial bite as
Kevin noted in our 2008 Shiver review. But I also recall brake feel,
well, lacked some feel.
According to Aprilia, brake pad material remains the same, so maybe it’s just my imagination, but feel seems to have improved.
Multi-point
reach adjustments for the brake and clutch levers are nice, but reach
to either lever is kind of long, even when set to the position offering
the shortest reach. The standard position requires some pretty big mitts
in order to stretch all the way out there to grab hold, so it’s a safe
guess that lady riders who like the Shiver may look to the aftermarket
for levers with more range, or a different range of adjustment.
The
frame’s steel-tube trellis bolted to aluminum side plates also remains
the same as before, as does the unadjustable 43mm inverted fork and
linkage-less shock offering spring preload along with rebound damping
adjustment.
Around
these parts we tend to prefer the more progressive and linear action
provided by shocks utilizing linkage. But at least accessing the
Shiver’s inline shock is ultra easy compared to most bikes. And we have
to think that offering at least spring preload for the front would seem
on order for such a sporty bike like the Shiver.
According
to Josh Kane, Technical Service Manager at Piaggio’s USA Costa Mesa,
Calif., training and technical center, a couple simple adjustments to
the Shiver’s suspension improve further the Shiver’s already admirable
handling.
Raising the Shiver’s fork tubes
to two lines showing above the triple clamp (stock shows no lines), and
adjusting shock spring preload so that 27.5mm of threads show (stock is
9.7) followed by 8 clicks of rebound (from fully closed) instead of the
stock setting of 11 is the ticket to even better steering response and
overall handling.
Rear
tire size of 180/55-17 remains from the first generation Shiver, but
the 0.5-inch narrower rear wheel on the new Shiver creates improved
triangulation in the tire’s profile, matching better with the front
tire’s profile and is the key factor in the new Shiver’s improved
steering and handling qualities.
The
chassis does an excellent job of generating easy, linear steering while
keeping this Italian machine tracking predictably through turns. A set
of grippy Pirelli Diablo Corsa III tires keep it all glued to the
asphalt.
Although
it wasn’t a complete makeover, the Shiver received some useful
treatments for 2010/11. But what’s stayed the same between the first
Shiver and latest and greatest Shiver is its MSRP of $8999.
The Shiver can’t out-gun the
Monster 796 in a battle of engine performance, but to get the Duc’s
extra 10 ft-lbs you’ll need to shell out another $600 over the Shiver’s
price tag to get the base model Monster.
When
considering the Shiver offers the feature of switchable mapping, more
upright, everyday livable ergos and overall performance that rivals the
796, you may find that relatively small price gap more appealing than it
first seemed.
My recent re-acquaintance with the updated Shiver makes me think I’d look twice at the Shiver if I were in your shoes.
Thursday, May 16, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)

















































0 comments :
Post a Comment